Domestic Workers in India – Supreme Court Directive and Policy Challenges
Background and Recent Supreme Court Directive
In January 2025, the Supreme Court directed the Union Government to:
Enact a comprehensive national law defining the rights and protections of domestic workers.
Constitute a committee to prepare a framework for the same and submit a report within six months.
The directive arose from a criminal case involving the trafficking and confinement of a tribal domestic worker from Chhattisgarh to Delhi.
Status of Domestic Workers in India
Estimated number: Between 4 million and 90 million, showing lack of reliable data.
Gender composition: Majority are women and girls.
Social background: Predominantly from Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST).
Nature of work:
Often isolated in private homes, making inspection and monitoring difficult.
Exposed to harassment, abuse, and segregation.
Child labour is rampant.
Many are migrant workers (inter-state and from neighbouring countries).
Employment intermediaries: Exploitative brokers and placement agencies dominate the recruitment process.
Work conditions:
Varying hours (part-time or multiple households).
Minimum wages, work hours, and leave entitlements are rarely enforced.
Legal and Institutional Gaps
No national-level legislation for domestic workers’ welfare and protection.
India voted in favour of the ILO Convention No. 189 (2011) on domestic workers’ rights but has not ratified it.
Past efforts:
Multiple legislative attempts since 1950s.
National Platform for Domestic Workers (NPDW) formed in 2012, drafted the Domestic Workers (Regulation of Work and Social Security) Bill, 2017, which remains unenacted.
Current concern: The Supreme Court committee has no representation from domestic workers, only “subject experts”.
State-Level Initiatives
Tamil Nadu
Welfare board under the Tamil Nadu Manual Workers Act, 1982.
Benefits: Pensions, maternity benefits, educational assistance, accident relief.
Issues:
Low registration of workers.
Minimum wage: ₹37–39/hour, but actual earnings are lower.
Workers categorized as part-time, lacking full-time protection.
Judicial intervention:
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court directed the State to consider a special law for domestic workers.
Karnataka (2025 Initiative)
Introduced the Domestic Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Bill, 2025:
Mandatory registration of both employers and workers.
Written employment contract specifying wages and hours.
Entitlements: Minimum wage, overtime pay, weekly holidays.
Employer contribution: 5% of wages to a welfare fund for benefits.
Recommendations and Needed Reforms
A. Wage and Legal Reforms
Only 12 States currently stipulate minimum wages for domestic workers.
Need to:
Revise and standardize wages across States.
Enforce working hours, rest days, and leave provisions.
B. Institutional Mechanisms
Compulsory registration of all employers, workers, and agencies (as per NPDW draft Bill).
Workbook system:
Issued and maintained through a tripartite board (State–Employer–Employee).
Monthly endorsements for transparency.
C. Protection from Harassment
Sexual harassment redressal committees under the POSH Act must extend to panchayat and urban local bodies for domestic workers’ access.
D. Social Security and Housing
Need structural housing and welfare mechanisms instead of crisis-based relief (like during COVID-19 lockdowns).
Welfare funds (like Karnataka’s 5% model) can support pensions, insurance, and child education.
Way Forward
Ratify ILO Convention No. 189 on domestic workers.
Pass a comprehensive central legislation ensuring:
Minimum wages
Regulated work hours
Social security and insurance
Access to grievance redressal
Representation in policy formulation
Ensure inter-state coordination for migrant domestic workers’ rights.
Prelims Practice MCQ
Q. Which of the following best describes the significance of ILO Convention No. 189 (2011)?
(a) It provides a framework for protecting the rights of construction workers globally.
(b) It sets international standards for the rights and protections of domestic workers.
(c) It regulates minimum wages for unorganized sector workers.
(d) It ensures safety measures for migrant labourers in the informal sector.
✅ Answer: (b)
Explanation: ILO Convention 189 ensures fair treatment, minimum wages, social protection, and labour rights for domestic workers.
Q. India’s stance on ILO Convention No. 189 is that:
(a) It has neither voted in favour nor ratified the Convention.
(b) It has ratified the Convention and incorporated it into national law.
(c) It voted in favour of the Convention but has not ratified it.
(d) It abstained from voting on the Convention.
✅ Answer: (c)
Explanation: India supported the adoption of ILO Convention No. 189 but has not ratified it yet.